Thursday, September 17, 2009

Privacy and Grief

Throughout my two and three quarter years of studying journalism, I've been constantly reminded of 'the death knock'. That is, approaching the home of a family who have just lost a loved one in order to write a story. Most journalists I've spoken to have agreed that it's one of the hardest things to do as a journalist. Despite this, the general view of the public is as though we relish in it.

As Kimberly quoted in her presentation: 'Journalists are sometimes accused of exploiting people experiencing the torment of grief" (Conley and Lamble, 2006, p. 386). Unfortunately, there are examples that suggest that journalists have gone too far when reporting on deaths (including coverage of the recent death of the boy from Mullumbimby who died after a school yard fight, as discussed in the presentation).

Often a family will be willing to share their grief with the journalist. However, there are many cases where families will outright refuse to be interviewed and should be treated with sensitivity at all times. Further, it should be respected that the victim's family have the right to say no to an interview.

The MEAA Code of Ethics says "journalists have the right to resist compulsion to intrude' (Conley and Lamble, 2006, p. 386). Journalists should use personal discretion when asked to do a 'death knock'. This is undoubtedly harder than it sounds. After all, could a cadet journalist really say to their boss 'No, sorry, I don't want to do that'? Probably not. However, I would argue that breaching the privacy of a grieving family is much worse than losing a story.

Wednesday, September 9, 2009

What does it mean to be objective?

The topic this week is 'Truth and Objectivity'. It is my belief that telling the truth is the easy part. If you stick to the facts, quote correctly and provide a balanced account, you can't go wrong. Objectivity, however, can be quite hard to achieve. Can we really ever be 100 percent objective?

The definition of objectivity provided in class this week is as follows: "the ability to perceive or describe something without being influenced by personal emotions or prejudices" (Encarta Encyclopedia).

It is my belief, as was discussed in class, that the extent to which journalists can achieve objectivity is questionable. We will always have subjective influences. Whether it be the relationship we have with our coworkers, the connection we may have with a particular story or even our mood on that particular day.

These type of influences are hard to disconnect with. However, there are many other practices that can be avoided and will assist in reaching the goal of objectivity. These include conflict of interest, commercial interests and accepting gifts or personal gain.

Unfortunately many journalists do not strive to achieve objectivity and give the profession a bad name. You only have to watch Media Watch to get a taste of the many journalists failing to remain objective.

Just last month on Seven's Sunrise, a 'news story' was run about Jet Star's latest deals. Coincidentally (or not), Jet Star also happen to be sponsor Sunrise. The story was treated as news. I think this is a perfect example of a situation where conflict of interest has played its part.

Here is a story about it from Media Watch.

While we can learn about all about this at University, it won't be until we are out there in the industry until our ability to remain objective can really be tested.

Thursday, September 3, 2009

Media Duped

This week was my turn to present to the class on the rule of the search engine for modern journalists.

I spoke of an incident that occured recently where internet marketer Lyndon Antcliff created a false story about a 13 year old boy from Texas who had allegedly gone on a $30,000 shopping spree with his father's credit card. And what did he buy? Hookers. The story was completely false, but thanks to Antcliff's skills in getting the story rated highly in web searches, it was picked up by media outlets around the world and is believed to have gained about 6000 links across the web.

The saga was labeled 'link bait' and demonstrates just how easy it is to get particular sites ranked highly in web searches and emphasises the need for journalists to be constantly critically assertive when using search engines in their news writing process.

Here is a segment aired on Media Watch about the link bait incident.

http://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/watch/default.htm?program=mediawatch&pres=20080526_2120&story=1